Required Materials and Tasks
Due July 27 Tuesday: First Draft of Course Requirement–Course Rationale
Due July 27 Tuesday: Required Readings on AI
AI and First-Year Composition
- Cummings, R. E., Monroe, S. M., & Watkins, M. (2024). Generative AI in first-year writing: An early analysis of affordances, limitations, and a framework for the future. Computers and Composition, 71, 102827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102827
- This article reports on first-year writing assignments using tools such as Elicit, Fermat, and Wordtune, finding that students saw value in AI for brainstorming, sources, counterarguments, and word choice, but often avoided it because of unreliability and the time needed to evaluate its output.
- Vetter, M. A., Lucia, B., Jiang, J., & Othman, M. (2024). Towards a framework for local interrogation of AI ethics: A case study on text generators, academic integrity, and composing with ChatGPT. Computers and Composition, 71, 102831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102831
- This article by our own Dr. Vetter! and colleagues uses a qualitative case study of one composition student’s work with ChatGPT to argue for a “local ethic” of AI use that emerges through classroom-level negotiations among pedagogy, student agency, reliability, access, and academic integrity.
- Graham, S. S. (2023). Post-process but not post-writing: Large language models and a future for composition pedagogy. Composition Studies, 51(1), 162–168.
- Graham argues that fears about AI-assisted writing often rely on an overly linear model of writing, and he suggests that composition instructors can draw on post-process understandings of writing to build pedagogies that engage AI rather than simply prohibit it.
The Environmental Impact of AI
- Zewe, A. (2025, January 17). Explained: Generative AI’s environmental impact. MIT News. https://news.mit.edu/2025/explained-generative-ai-environmental-impact-0117
- The article explains how generative AI systems require substantial electricity, water, and computing infrastructure, leading to increased carbon emissions, water consumption, and other environmental impacts that extend beyond simply using a chatbot.
MLA-CCCC Joint Task Force on Writing and AI
-
- MLA-CCCC Joint Task Force on Writing and AI. (2023). MLA-CCCC Joint Task Force on Writing and AI working paper: Overview of the issues, statement of principles, and recommendations. Modern Language Association and Conference on College Composition and Communication.
- This CCCC/MLA working paper frames generative AI as a major writing-instruction issue, warning against surveillance-heavy responses while urging teachers and programs to develop policies rooted in writing process, student learning, equity, and critical AI literacy.
- MLA-CCCC Joint Task Force on Writing and AI. (2023). MLA-CCCC Joint Task Force on Writing and AI working paper: Overview of the issues, statement of principles, and recommendations. Modern Language Association and Conference on College Composition and Communication.
Class Activities
Act 1: Opening (1 hour and 15 minutes)
Part 1. Small Group Discussion of Your Course Rationale (45 minutes)
- Give each person in your group time to discuss their Course Rationale
- Let the teacher discuss their ideas
- Let’s give each person at least 10 minutes to talk about their course rationale
- Then have group members offer thoughts, responses, and feedback
- Be sure to point out the strengths of the syllabus
Part 2. Full Class Discussion (15 minutes)
- We will take turns talking about the general pedagogies people selected for their rationale and some of the key things people noticed
- We will go by group
Intermission 1 (10 Minutes)
Break (10 minutes)
- We’ll take a short break
Act 2: Website Building (1 hour)
Part 3. The Value of Teacher Websites
- I built my first website almost 3 decades ago
- It was fun way back then, and I still love web work
- It’s a great way to highlight yourself as a Teacher Scholar in a personal, immediate way
- Website building is also fun and a very hands on activity
- It also teachers patience and appreciation for imperfection
- Dr. Pagnucci will guide you through the process of building Your Own Teacher Website in class
Part 4. Building Your Teacher Website
There are many ways to build a website. My pagnucci.org website is built with software called WordPress. I like WordPress because it is easy to use but also has lots of features for customizing your site. You are free to use whatever software you would like to build your website, but I’ll discuss how to use WordPress in class. If you already have a website at your home university, you can add to it as long as you have the power to access and change that website.
- Wix
- The link below is to a good Wix template for creating a basic professional academic web site:
Wix/Aria Prompt
- Purpose: I want to create a professional teacher portfolio website. I want a simple design. This will be a static page to deliver information. I do not want to offer any services.
- Menu Navigation: Give me a row of simple menu items across the top to get to secondary pages. I want one menu for Teaching, one for Scholarship, one for Service, one for Resources, and one for Contact Information. On each page, put some a couple headings and some dummy text. On the resources page, put a couple headings and a list with 2 links to IUP, the IUP Composition and Applied Linguistics Program, and Dr. Pagnucci’s English 830 website.
- Additional Content: I do not want this website to be designed for scrolling down. I want to click menus to get to the various elements of the website. Each page will have a heading with some information and maybe a couple pictures. Visitors will then click the menu items to go to the secondary pages.
- Colors: Make the website red, white, with a light royal blue background.
Alternative Website Tool
Basic Teacher Websites
Below is basic information you will likely want to include on your website:
Intermission 1 (10 Minutes)
Break (10 minutes)
- We’ll take a short break
Act 3: AI (1 hour)
Part 5. Journal Writing (15 minutes)
We’ve already talked about AI. It’s hard not to. But let’s take some time to reflect on our use or refusal to use, both AI, and technology:
- Thinking of our big technologies, the mobile phone, the calculator, the Internet, email, Word Processing, how would you say tech has impacted you positively?
- How has tech impacted you negatively?
- Walter Ong noted that writing is a technology which changes thought. How do you think writing impacts your own thinking?
- Now let’s have you think about AI. AI has been around for a long time, as spell check, grammar correction, and text prediction, and also in much of the software we use. Why do those uses of AI seem “safer” while ChatGPT has so many people worried?
- If two students are in a writing class and one student is a great, A level writer, and one is a C level writer, why shouldn’t the weaker writer get to use a tool to assist them or should they get to use that tool?
- Is AI somehow different from technologies like text to sound or visual assistance technologies which level the field for different physical ability levels? Is this a fair comparison? Why or why not?
- Wether or not you support or agree with the use of AI, how should we respond to the way AI is reshaping the world?
Part 6. Small Group Discussion (20 minutes)
- Talk about what you wrote.
Part 7. Full Class Discussion (20 minutes)
- We will talk about our overall thoughts concerning AI.
Act 4: Closing (15 minutes)
Part 8. Class Wrap-up (5 minutes)
- Dr. Pagnucci will take time to go over course assignments and answer any questions
Part 9. Parting Thoughts
Other Assignments
Due 29 Wednesday: “Required” Snacking
- If you are able to, please bring a snack to share for Finding Forrester
For July 30 Thursday: Special Personal Object
- If possible, please bring to class a small object that is significant to you
- If you can’t physically get the object, then, if possible, get a photograph of the object (otherwise you will have to use your memory)
- Also, if possible, get a picture of the room in which you normally keep this object